Skip to content

Outage tracker / Telegram

Is Telegram down?

I'm having a problem

Checks passingchecked 1 minute ago

Our checks of Telegram pass from all 10 regions we check.

As of Nov 5, 2026, 3:42 PM UTC, RealUptime's checks of Telegram passed in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Front-door and live API checks

Our checks of Telegram did not fail from two or more distant regions in the 89 days we have checked it (since Aug 8, 2026). This does not show Telegram works for users.

Email me when our checks of Telegram fail from two or more distant regions

One email when our checks of Telegram fail from two or more distant regions, and one when they pass, after you confirm the address. No account, no card.

This is our own reading from outside. It is not Telegram's official status.

our check readinglive · checked Nov 5, 2026, 3:42 PM UTC
US-East904 msChecks passing
US-West1769 msChecks passing
Europe761 msChecks passing
Asia-Pacific3202 msChecks passing
US-Central1009 msChecks passing
Canada1469 msChecks passing
UK520 msChecks passing
Southeast Asia1973 msChecks passing
Australia3268 msChecks passing
South America2309 msChecks passing
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

Telegram publishes no status feed we can read, so the only reading here is our check reading on the left.

Telegram response time, by region

US-East
1.5sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 594ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 668ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 698ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 651ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 634ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 617ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 659ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 530ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 569ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 654ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.5s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
US-West
2.6sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 833ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 830ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 950ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 915ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 863ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 840ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 884ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 854ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 839ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 797ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 2.6s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Europe
1.6sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 383ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 297ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 240ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 229ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 382ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 327ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 233ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 172ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 256ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 387ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 379ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 881ms2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 962ms2026-10-25 UTC: p95 980ms2026-10-26 UTC: p95 1s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.6s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Asia-Pacific
3.2sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 3.4s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 4.4s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 2.9s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 3.3s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 3.2s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 3.2s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
US-Central
1.3sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 771ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 851ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 824ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 881ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 955ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 781ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 840ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 984ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 909ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 926ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.3s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Canada
1.6sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 578ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 680ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 698ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 597ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 596ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 694ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 633ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 712ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 676ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 653ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.6s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
UK
829msp95 · latest
1s500ms0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 1s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 276ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 292ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 362ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 315ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 170ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 232ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 218ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 202ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 163ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 170ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 633ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 666ms2026-10-19 UTC: p95 704ms2026-10-20 UTC: p95 843ms2026-10-21 UTC: p95 657ms2026-10-22 UTC: p95 710ms2026-10-23 UTC: p95 726ms2026-10-24 UTC: p95 738ms2026-10-25 UTC: p95 793ms2026-10-26 UTC: p95 855ms2026-10-27 UTC: p95 692ms2026-10-28 UTC: p95 762ms2026-10-29 UTC: p95 846ms2026-10-30 UTC: p95 846ms2026-10-31 UTC: p95 687ms2026-11-01 UTC: p95 722ms2026-11-02 UTC: p95 695ms2026-11-03 UTC: p95 672ms2026-11-04 UTC: p95 539ms2026-11-05 UTC: p95 829ms
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Southeast Asia
2.6sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 998ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 2.6s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Australia
4.2sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 2.8s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 4.0s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 4.5s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 4.7s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 4.3s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 4.2s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 4.5s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 4.2s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 3.5s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 3.5s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 4.2s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 4.2s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 4.0s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 3.7s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 4.2s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 4.7s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 4.0s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 4.2s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 4.3s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 4.2s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 4.2s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
South America
4.0sp95 · latest
10s5s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 10s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 3.0s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 3.7s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 3.6s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 3.9s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 3.7s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 3.7s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 8.7s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 2.9s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 3.2s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 3.3s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 2.9s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 3.1s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 3.6s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 3.6s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 2.9s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 3.9s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 4.0s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5

Check your own site while you wait on Telegram

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not Telegram. It cannot diagnose Telegram's own systems.

What we measured, function by function

Telegram answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the web row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebprimaryUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • AuthUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • ProfilesUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • Public channelsUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • WebsiteUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What our checks show, and what people reported

  • North America
    Checks passingUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Checks passinglatency: 904msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:39 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Checks passinglatency: 1769msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:29 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Checks passinglatency: 1009msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:42 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Checks passinglatency: 1469msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:34 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Checks passinglatency: 2309msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:40 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    Checks passingEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Checks passinglatency: 761msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:36 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Checks passinglatency: 520msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:39 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    Checks passingAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Checks passinglatency: 3202msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:29 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Checks passinglatency: 1973msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:23 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Checks passinglatency: 3268msstatus code: 200checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:40 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach Telegram normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using Telegram, counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We started counting reports for Telegram on September 8, 2026.

Recent probe events

No probe events on record yet for Telegram.

check entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring Telegram since August 8, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for Telegram covering any window you pick, with our check readings and Telegram's own claim at the time, side by side.

Full check history for Telegram: 90 days of check results by region, month-by-month uptime by our checks, and every probe event on record.

Put this badge in your README

Telegram uptime by RealUptime's checksLive, from this page's own readings.
[![Telegram uptime by RealUptime's checks](https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram/badge.svg?days=30" alt="Telegram uptime by RealUptime's checks" height="20"></a>

Share of checks passed over 30 days; the window is printed on it. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so and shows no color. How the badge works.

To cite this page: RealUptime, "Is Telegram down?", https://realuptime.io/outages/telegram. The readings change with every check, so give the date you read them.

How our checks compare with Telegram's stated SLA

At or above your target

Our checks of Telegram failed for none over the last 30 days, which is 100% uptime by our checks. A 99.9% target allows 43 minutes over that period.

Our checks show no gap in this period. That does not rule out one you saw.

These figures come from our own checks of one public endpoint per service. They are not the service's real uptime. This is computed from our own checks, not from Telegram's SLA instrumentation. Their contract is normally measured against their own systems, with their own exclusions and a claim window, so their figure and ours will differ. Use this to start the conversation and ask for their number. It is not legal advice and it is not a determination of what you are owed.

What we check

primary
https://web.telegram.org/
secondaryfunctional: auth surface
https://api.telegram.org/bot0:0/getMe
secondary
https://t.me/s/telegram
secondary
https://t.me/telegram
secondary
https://telegram.org/img/t_logo.png

What our check can and cannot see

A pass means the service's public web page loaded and answered normally. It does not show that the product, the API or sign-in behind it works; a page can load from a cache while the product is down.

Host checked: web.telegram.org

RealUptime is not affiliated with Telegram; the name identifies what we checked, and nothing here speaks for Telegram's own team. We send a single web request to Telegram from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside Telegram's systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal Telegram's own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for Telegram is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a passing check there says an API answered, though it still does not show that every feature of the service works for you. Read the full methodology.