Skip to content

Outage tracker / Vercel

Is Vercel down?

I'm having a problem

Vendor reports no incidentWhat Vercel reports

Vercel reports no incident on its status page.

As of the last successful poll, 2026-11-05 15:29 UTC.

Vercel's status page

Our regional reading

This is our own reading from outside, shown beside the vendor's statement. It is not counted as a separate outage.

Checks passingchecked 1 minute ago

Our checks of Vercel pass from all 10 regions we check.

As of Nov 5, 2026, 3:42 PM UTC, RealUptime's checks of Vercel passed in all 10 regions that returned a reading.

Front-door and live API checks

our check readinglive · checked Nov 5, 2026, 3:42 PM UTC
US-East570 msChecks passing
US-West666 msChecks passing
Europe474 msChecks passing
Asia-Pacific1160 msChecks passing
US-Central588 msChecks passing
Canada655 msChecks passing
UK416 msChecks passing
Southeast Asia2134 msChecks passing
Australia1044 msChecks passing
South America2041 msChecks passing
their status pagetheir claim, not our reading

Vercel reports: All systems operational (“All Systems Operational”)

from Vercel's own status page, checked Nov 5, 2026, 3:13 PM UTC
Vercel's own status page shows no incident, and our checks of Vercel pass right now.

Vercel's own component breakdown, as they publish it

  • AI GatewayOperational
  • ARN1 - Stockholm, SwedenOperational
  • BlobOperational
  • BuildsOperational
  • BuildsOperational
  • DashboardOperational
  • DrainsOperational
  • Output GenerationOperational
  • APIOperational
  • BOM1 - Mumbai, IndiaOperational
  • DashboardOperational
  • Global ConfigOperational
  • LogsOperational
  • Support CenterOperational
  • npm RegistryOperational
  • CDG1 - Paris, France, EuropeOperational
  • Deploy HooksOperational
  • ObservabilityOperational
  • Support ChatOperational
  • CLE1 - Cleveland, East USOperational
  • Git IntegrationsOperational
  • Speed InsightsOperational
  • CPT1 - Cape Town, South AfricaOperational
  • Web AnalyticsOperational
  • CommunityOperational
  • DUB1 - Dublin, IrelandOperational
  • Cron JobsOperational
  • DXB1 - Dubai, UAEOperational
  • Integration WebhooksOperational
  • FRA1 - Frankfurt, Germany, EuropeOperational
  • Data CacheOperational
  • GRU1 - São Paulo, BrazilOperational
  • DNSOperational
  • HKG1 - Hong KongOperational
  • Domain RegistrationOperational
  • HND1 - Tokyo, JapanOperational
  • FirewallOperational
  • IAD1 - Washington DC, USAOperational
  • FunctionsOperational
  • ICN1 - Seoul, South KoreaOperational
  • Image OptimizationOperational
  • KIX1 - Osaka, JapanOperational
  • LHR1 - London, UKOperational
  • PDX1 - Portland, West USOperational
  • MarketplaceOperational
  • SFO1 - San Francisco, CA, USAOperational
  • QueuesOperational
  • SIN1 - SingaporeOperational
  • Remote CachingOperational
  • SYD1 - Sydney, AustraliaOperational
  • Routing MiddlewareOperational
  • YUL1 - Montréal, CanadaOperational
  • SAML Single Sign-OnOperational
  • SandboxOperational
  • TLS CertificatesOperational
  • WorkflowOperational
  • Container RegistryOperational
  • Key Management ServiceOperational
  • ConnectOperational

These are Vercel's components, named and scored by Vercel. We do not map them onto the functions we check above, because we have no way to know which of their components our checks touch. Two lists, side by side, neither one rewriting the other.

This is Vercel's own claim about their service, shown separately from what we measured. We never change our own numbers based on what a vendor reports, and this reading never changes theirs. Read both.

Vercel response time, by region

US-East
1.2sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-East response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-East, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 375ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 416ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 479ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 517ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 508ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 430ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 503ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 477ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 497ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 471ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 996ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 980ms2026-10-25 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 978ms2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 972ms2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.2s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
US-West
1.3sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-West response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-West, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 184ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 177ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 195ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 323ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 306ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 359ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 475ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 443ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 357ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 279ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 749ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 955ms2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 885ms2026-10-24 UTC: p95 335ms2026-10-25 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.3s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Europe
1.4sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Europe response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Europe, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 730ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 650ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 635ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 753ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 678ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 741ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 565ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 567ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 665ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 546ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 678ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 889ms2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 999ms2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 794ms2026-11-04 UTC: p95 754ms2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.4s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Asia-Pacific
1.6sp95 · latest
10s5s0ms
Asia-Pacific response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Asia-Pacific, scaled to a maximum of 10s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 883ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 961ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 673ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 720ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 710ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 856ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 946ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 6.8s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 1.5s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.6s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
US-Central
1.5sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
US-Central response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for US-Central, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 520ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 623ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 684ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 400ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 216ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 288ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 349ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 546ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 334ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 414ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 821ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 897ms2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 976ms2026-10-24 UTC: p95 597ms2026-10-25 UTC: p95 657ms2026-10-26 UTC: p95 287ms2026-10-27 UTC: p95 419ms2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 945ms2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.5s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Canada
1.2sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
Canada response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Canada, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 321ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 603ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 600ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 346ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 231ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 373ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 434ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 456ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 405ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 432ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 900ms2026-10-25 UTC: p95 919ms2026-10-26 UTC: p95 961ms2026-10-27 UTC: p95 615ms2026-10-28 UTC: p95 516ms2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 962ms2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.2s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
UK
1.6sp95 · latest
2s1s0ms
UK response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for UK, scaled to a maximum of 2s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 605ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 660ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 802ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 568ms2026-10-11 UTC: p95 561ms2026-10-12 UTC: p95 618ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 652ms2026-10-14 UTC: p95 550ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 538ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 584ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 654ms2026-10-18 UTC: p95 714ms2026-10-19 UTC: p95 633ms2026-10-20 UTC: p95 770ms2026-10-21 UTC: p95 636ms2026-10-22 UTC: p95 690ms2026-10-23 UTC: p95 702ms2026-10-24 UTC: p95 688ms2026-10-25 UTC: p95 794ms2026-10-26 UTC: p95 700ms2026-10-27 UTC: p95 442ms2026-10-28 UTC: p95 646ms2026-10-29 UTC: p95 364ms2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 712ms2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.6s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Southeast Asia
2.6sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
Southeast Asia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Southeast Asia, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 969ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 987ms2026-10-09 UTC: p95 923ms2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.5s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.7s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 2.6s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
Australia
1.8sp95 · latest
2.5s1.3s0ms
Australia response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for Australia, scaled to a maximum of 2.5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 932ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 957ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 999ms2026-10-15 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-16 UTC: p95 822ms2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 2.4s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 913ms2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.3s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 1.2s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.8s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5
South America
1.9sp95 · latest
5s2.5s0ms
South America response time (p95) over the last 30 daysDaily 95th-percentile response time for South America, scaled to a maximum of 5s. Days with no samples are not plotted, not shown as zero.2026-10-07 UTC: p95 996ms2026-10-08 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-09 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-10 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-11 UTC: p95 1.4s2026-10-12 UTC: p95 930ms2026-10-13 UTC: p95 1.0s2026-10-14 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-15 UTC: p95 976ms2026-10-16 UTC: p95 1.1s2026-10-17 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-18 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-19 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-20 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-21 UTC: p95 2.0s2026-10-22 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-23 UTC: p95 4.1s2026-10-24 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-25 UTC: p95 2.6s2026-10-26 UTC: p95 2.3s2026-10-27 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-10-28 UTC: p95 1.7s2026-10-29 UTC: p95 1.8s2026-10-30 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-10-31 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-11-01 UTC: p95 2.2s2026-11-02 UTC: p95 2.1s2026-11-03 UTC: p95 1.9s2026-11-04 UTC: p95 1.6s2026-11-05 UTC: p95 1.9s
Oct 7Oct 21Nov 5

Check your own site while you wait on Vercel

Watching an outage above does not tell you whether your own connection or site is also having a problem. Enter your own URL for one live check, right now, no signup. This checks the site you enter, not Vercel. It cannot diagnose Vercel's own systems.

What we measured, function by function

Vercel answers on more than one surface, and they can fail apart. Each row is one surface, checked from the same regions. The verdict above follows the api row, because that is the surface we treat as this service's own; a failure on any other row is a partial outage, not a full one.

  • WebUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing
  • APIprimaryUS-East: Checks passingUS-West: Checks passingEurope: Checks passingAsia-Pacific: Checks passingUS-Central: Checks passingCanada: Checks passingUK: Checks passingSoutheast Asia: Checks passingAustralia: Checks passingSouth America: Checks passing

Email me when Vercel reports an incident on its status page, and again when it reports it resolved.

Get an email when Vercel reports an incident

Email me when Vercel reports an incident on its status page, and again when it reports it resolved. No account, no card.

Delivery channel

Double opt-in: nothing is sent until you click the link in the confirmation email. One email when it reports an incident, one when it reports it resolved, and a one-click unsubscribe in every one. We do not send anything else to this address.

This is Vercel's own statement from its status page, with our regional reading beside it.

What are you seeing? (optional)

No account needed, and we never store your IP address. Reports are counted separately from our own measurements and are always shown as unverified.

What our checks show, and what people reported

  • North America
    Checks passingUS-East, US-West, US-Central, Canada
    • US-East
      Checks passinglatency: 570msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:42 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-East probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from US-East to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-West
      Checks passinglatency: 666msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:42 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-West probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from US-West to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • US-Central
      Checks passinglatency: 588msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:33 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur US-Central probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from US-Central to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Canada
      Checks passinglatency: 655msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:26 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Canada probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Canada to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • South America
    Checks passinglatency: 2041msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:37 PM UTC
    0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur South America probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from South America to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Europe
    Checks passingEurope, UK
    • Europe
      Checks passinglatency: 474msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:39 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Europe probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Europe to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • UK
      Checks passinglatency: 416msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:37 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur UK probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from UK to say anything about what people there are seeing.
  • Asia Pacific
    Checks passingAsia-Pacific, Southeast Asia, Australia
    • Asia-Pacific
      Checks passinglatency: 1160msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:33 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Asia-Pacific probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Asia-Pacific to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Southeast Asia
      Checks passinglatency: 2134msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:33 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Southeast Asia probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Southeast Asia to say anything about what people there are seeing.
    • Australia
      Checks passinglatency: 1044msstatus code: 403checked: Nov 5, 2026, 3:37 PM UTC
      0 people in the last 5 minutesNot enough reports to sayOur Australia probes reach Vercel normally. We do not have enough reports from Australia to say anything about what people there are seeing.

Somewhere else or not sure: 0 people in the last 5 minutes

These are unverified reports from people using Vercel, counted separately from what our own probes measure. Anyone can file one, no account is needed, and the region on a report is chosen by the person filing it. We never open, extend or close an outage in our record based on report volume: only our own measurements do that. We have not received any reports for Vercel yet, which is not evidence that nothing is wrong.

Recent probe events

Delays in Logs and Observability data, 1h 2mdeclared on their status page2026-10-23
Increased build and deployment failures, 6h 36mdeclared on their status page2026-10-12
Delays in Drains, Observability, and Workflow in Washington (iad1), 1h 21mdeclared on their status page2026-10-10
Vercel Auth login failures for pages with Deployment Protection enabled, 16mdeclared on their status page2026-10-06
Elevated Sandbox error rates in Paris (cdg1), 25mdeclared on their status page2026-10-06
Build failures and 500 errors for functions using Edge runtime, 27mdeclared on their status page2026-09-28
Deployment stuck in initializing state, 55mdeclared on their status page2026-09-18
Elevated Errors Triggering Deployments, 50mdeclared on their status page2026-09-18

check entries are our own probes' readings; declared entries are the vendor's. How this check works

We have been measuring Vercel since August 8, 2026. We show nothing from before that date, and we never add an outage we did not observe ourselves, from any source.

Need this in writing? Generate an SLA evidence report for Vercel covering any window you pick, with our check readings and Vercel's own claim at the time, side by side.

Full check history for Vercel: 90 days of check results by region, month-by-month uptime by our checks, and every probe event on record.

Monitor your own site the same way

This page shows what we see when we check this service, using the same ten regions, for a site you run. RealUptime Monitor watches your own servers from inside your network, and it starts free.

Start monitoring your own servers

Run a service people depend on? Give them a status page on your own domain, checked every minute from six regions, for $9 a month. Get Starter

Put this badge in your README

Vercel uptime by RealUptime's checksLive, from this page's own readings.
[![Vercel uptime by RealUptime's checks](https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel/badge.svg?days=30)](https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel)
<a href="https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel"><img src="https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel/badge.svg?days=30" alt="Vercel uptime by RealUptime's checks" height="20"></a>

Share of checks passed over 30 days; the window is printed on it. If our readings go stale it says stale, and if we have no readings it says so and shows no color. How the badge works.

To cite this page: RealUptime, "Is Vercel down?", https://realuptime.io/outages/vercel. The readings change with every check, so give the date you read them.

What we check

primaryfunctional: live API
https://api.vercel.com/v2/user
secondary
https://vercel.com/
secondary
https://www.vercel-status.com/

What our check can and cannot see

A pass means the service's servers answered with the sign-in refusal they give any request that is not signed in. It does not show that sign-in works or that anything behind the sign-in wall responds.

Host checked: api.vercel.com

RealUptime is not affiliated with Vercel; the name identifies what we checked, and nothing here speaks for Vercel's own team. We send a single web request to Vercel from 10 regions on our own schedule and time the response. We do not see inside Vercel's systems, do not use an account or real transaction, and are not the same signal Vercel's own team has access to. Treat this as one external data point, not a verdict. At least one endpoint we check for Vercel is a real functional API call (marked “functional” above), not just a landing page, so a passing check there says an API answered, though it still does not show that every feature of the service works for you. Read the full methodology.